Questions and Answers
Biological stoichiometry of nutrient limitation in ecology, evolution, & sustainability
Prof. Jim Elser, University of Montana,
https://flbs.umt.edu/newflbs/about-flbs/people/...
Questions | Answers |
---|---|
Carl Ramirez: |
I’m afraid I don’t know enough about atmospheric chemistry to know if there is a process by atmospheric N2O can be converted to NOx (and then come down in rain). I’m not sure that we would want to do that deliberately given the impacts of NOx deposition on ecosystems (acidification, fertilization) |
Anonymous Attendee: |
Nice question! Very early on we discovered that the identify of the nutrient (N vs P) limiting phytoplankton growth could be determined by zooplankton community structure (Daphnia vs copepods). This was completely unknown at the time and very surprising! I will never forget the first time I made the graphs that showed it. This led me down the path to ecological stoichiometry. |
k Hoshizaki: |
(wonderful to be back in touch with you. I wrote my chapters for the stoichiometry book during that trip to Japan) |
Junfeng Wang: |
I am not sure about the first part of your question but, yes, biomass production can be optimized (and use efficiency maximized) by matching N:P ratio to the demands of the consumer or crop. In agriculture fertilizers are formulated differently according to the particular crop. |
Frieda B. Taub: |
Hi Frieda! There is already some discussion of this. It would be a disaster on top of a disaster, as extracting sediments from the bottom of a lake or bay or estuary would be environmentally destructive, adding insult to an already insulted (eutrophied) ecosystem. |
Carl Ramirez: |
Yes, see answer to preceding question. |
Kaydee Barker: |
I hope my answer was OK. In many situations we need to make assumptions about things we haven’t or can’t measure. Now that we have more and more studies of C:N:P ratios in different organisms and pools (e.g. foliage, soil, sediments, lake water, seston, zoop biomass, etc etc) we have a much better basis for making those assumptions / assignments than we did previously, when people tended to assign some semi-arbitrary value (e.g 106C :16N: 1 P) to everything! |
Kaydee Barker: |
My talented PhD student Michelle McCrackin studied denitrification in the lakes in our N deposition study. You can see her findings here: |
Kaydee Barker: |
There is a lot of work going on the generate recycled fertilizers from various wastes. The most developed commercially now is struvite-based fertilizers generated in wastewater treatment plants. See https://ostara.com/. You can follow these developments and find out more via https://phosphorusalliance.org/ and https://www.phosphorusplatform.eu/ |
Mark Daniels: |
? The Haber-Bosch reaction produces ammonia for fertilizer from N2 gas in the atmosphere. It does not produce any phosphorus for fertilizer. And phosphorus cannot substitute for nitrogen in fertilizer (or vice versa) |
Enzai DU: |
This is an intriguing idea that seems related to the concept of “stoichiometric niche” proposed by Angelica Gonzalez and colleagues |
Todd Royer: |
Yes it is true to not all microbes treat NH4 and NO3 the same; the latter being more energetically expensive to process. For sake of “simplicity”, in ES theory we tend to squint our eyes and pretend that such things don’t matter. But they sometimes or often will and then inferences from simplified ES won’t work so well. As you know, often such tradeoffs get made in trying to find an approach that can work without getting too buried in details. |
xiaoming wan: |
The behavioral dimensions of stoichiometry are quite interesting. More work on this has been done with nitrogen and with insects. Many herbivorous insects prefer more N-rich food items; you can read about his in the book The Inadequate Environment. My talented PhD student found the opposite however for locusts – they prefer to eat (and perform better) on N-poor food. See |
Naijia Xiao: |
This is the question of stoichiometric homeostasis. As I discussed early in the talk, the generalization is that photoautotrophs (algae, plants) are more plastic / less homeostatic than heterotrophs (animals, bacteria). But there is much discussion! Here’s a review from 10+ years ago. |
Mark Daniels: |
We need do a lot of things: |
Zhanfei Liu: |
Yes there is a lot of work on GRH in bacteria. See work of Jim Cotner and others. |
Esteban Balseiro: |
Hola amigo! |
Mark Daniels: |
See above: ? The Haber-Bosch reaction produces ammonia for fertilizer from N2 gas in the atmosphere. It does not produce any phosphorus for fertilizer. And phosphorus cannot substitute for nitrogen in fertilizer (or vice versa) |
Timothy Burnette: |
Thanks! |
Kaydee Barker: |
You’re welcome! |
John Jacobs: |
You’re welcome! |
This seminar is part of the International Forum on Advanced Environmental Sciences and Technology (iFAST) seminar series. iFAST aims to provide an interactive forum to bring eminent scientists together to share their most recent advances in environmental sciences and technology with interested students, faculty, and other researchers. It also provides an opportunity to foster interdisciplinary networking among environmental researchers, engineers, and the general audience.